Exonerated? I think not
To the editor:
Recently president Trump has said many times he has been totally exonerated of many alleged crimes and/or civil actions. According to Merriam-Webster, to exonerate implies complete clearance from an accusation or charge and from any attendant suspicion of blame or guilt. It doesn’t mean that a justice department that is staffed by minions that purportedly swore an oath of loyalty to “the man” with the Constitution second, stating the case is closed or sealed. In the Epstein case, “the man” is mentioned as many as 1,500 times in the files already released, hmmmm, exonerated, I think not. We’re seeing people of influence around the world and here in the U.S. being investigated, arrested, fired and/or chastised and they didn’t even come close to getting the mentions of “the man.”
We also have learned there may be as many as 3 million more documents that haven’t been released, gee, I wonder why minions? Then, the documents case we just learned that the Trump-appointed judge has decided that the Smith report will not see the light of day, exonerated, I think not. The Georgia election interference case was dropped after the prosecutor was removed for having a relationship with one of the lead investigating attorneys, exonerated, I think not. The case that Smith brought regarding election interference was dismissed due to Trump winning the election not because Smith didn’t think he had enough proof of guilt, exonerated I think not. It seems to me that if Donald Trump is as innocent or as he says or totally exonerated, he would be happy to release everything post haste. Then we can truly put it all behind us and move on. We’re waiting. Signed by a radical, communistic, lunatic, far left, not smart, country-hating, ungodly Democrat.
Chuck Damp
Ray Brook
