In the days after the Parkland, Florida, gun massacre, the all-too-familiar solution to school violence of arming teachers surfaced. Some proponents of this strategy advocate arming all teachers while President Trump stated that up to 20 percent of instructors should have guns.

Alfonso Calderon, a survivor of the Florida killings, had an excellent response to the guns-for-teachers strategy:

Would arming 20 percent of teachers prevent school shootings? Perhaps. More likely it would only change the location of the massacre. A shooter afraid of confronting a gun-wielding teacher could easily shoot students at a school bus stop, or gun them down on the bus. Arm school bus drivers, and they will be the first ones shot.

We expect police officers and firefighters to risk their lives in the line of duty. Should we ask the same of teachers? What a sad commentary on this country that arming teachers to prevent students from being victims of a gun massacre is even considered.

While students from Parkland, Florida’s Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School were making the 400-mile trip to Tallahassee to voice their opinion about semi-automatic guns, their elected officials were voting down (71 to 36) a proposed ban on these weapons and large-capacity firearms magazines. Almost all of the individuals who voted against the ban in the Republican-dominated legislature have an rating from the NRA’s Political Victory Fund, a PAC associated with that pro-gun organization.

On the same day the gun vote was taken, Florida’s legislature approved a resolution introduced by Rep. Ross Spano (who is running for state attorney general) that pornography be declared a public Pornography bad. Guns good. Sounds like a skit and would be funny if not pathetically true.

Republican Sen. Macro Rubio of Florida tweeted that Hardly a surprising statement from a politician who has received more than $3 million from the NRA and its affiliates. It’s also flat-out wrong.

A Quinnipiac University poll taken a few days after the Florida gun massacre found 67 percent of Americans support a nationwide ban on the sale of assault weapons. In addition, support for gun owner background checks was almost universal with 97 percent of those surveyed advocating this position, including 97 percent of gun owners. The pollsters found that support for stricter gun control laws had increased from 47 to 66 percent in just over two years.

A survey conducted in April 2017 by Pubic Polling Policy found that 67 percent of gun owners polled said they either strongly or somewhat agree the NRA had changed from an organization dedicated to gun safety to one It’s Sen. Rubio and the other politicos on the NRA gift list that are out of step with the American public.

Over the years the NRA has created a winning strategy for advancing its agenda. There are at least four aspects of this social-political game plan.

1. The slippery slope argument — Preaching to its members that any form of gun control today will lead to the repeal of the Second Amendment tomorrow, and that federal agents will be confiscating all of your guns the day after, is the NRA’s first line of defense. As a consequence of this all-or-nothing scenario, compromise with gun control advocates is impossible.

2. Change and attack — This is another very effective NRA tactic. Shift the discussion from the latest massacre and attack those who want sane gun control laws. Addressing the Conservative Political Action Committee, NRA President Wayne LaPierre stated, That the number of guns in this country increased by approximately 39 million in the first four years of the Obama administration and that gun and ammunition sales increased by 8.4 percent annually during this period was conveniently ignored by LaPierre.

In that same speech, The NRA’s top man said, Yet another shift-and-blame tactic. For the NRA, the problem isn’t that almost anyone sane or insane can purchase a military-style weapon. No, the real problem lies with schools that don’t protect children from these individuals. Turn schools into hard targets, and individuals bent on killing children will attack them in : parks, playgrounds, youth centers, little league baseball and soccer games, or anyplace else young people congregate. Transforming the entire country into a is impossible.

3. Wait till the rage subsides — The strategy here is to wait until the post-massacre gun control storm declines; then it’s business as usual. A day after the Parkland, Florida, slaughter, Republican Speaker of the House Paul Ryan was asked if police should be able to confiscate guns from someone exhibiting signs of mental illness. Ryan stated, There have been 170 school shootings from the Columbine High School killings in 1999 to the Parkland slaughter, and Ryan doesn’t want to jump to conclusions. For the NRA and its political lackeys, there will never be a time of

4. Gun laws don’t work — When gun laws are enacted — almost always weak statutes because the NRA does everything possible to diminish them — and guns are used in a crime, the NRA loudly proclaims ignoring the fact there were at least 320 million guns (including millions of assault rifles) in private hands before some of these laws came into effect. Each one of these weapons — especially the estimated 300,000 to 600,000 guns that are stolen every year — are potential crime weapons. With so many firearms in this country, how can guns laws ever be anything more than minimally effective?

The unfortunate truth is that gun-related crime, including mass murders, are a fact of American life and the NRA leadership’s predictable response to these killings will continue. Victims and their loved ones they say while repeating the NRA mantra ad nauseam:

A gun-related massacre of children could happen every day, and the NRA would not change its position.

—

George J. Bryjak lives in Bloomingdale, retired after 24 years of teaching sociology at the University of San Diego.

—

Sources:

Berkowtiz, B., Lu, D., and Alcantara, C. (Feb. 16, 2018) The Washington Post, www.washingtonpost.com

Caldwell, L. (June 4, 2016) NBC News, www.nbcnews.com

Fisher, M. and J. Keller (Nov. 2, 2017) The New York Times, www.nytimes.com

Freskos, B. (Sept. 21, 2016) The Trace, www.thetrace.com

Gambino, L. (Feb. 18, 2018) The Guardian, www.theguardian.com

Hickey, W. (Jan. 13, 2018) Business Insider, www.businessinsider.com

Hill, C. (July 5, 2016) Market Watch, www.marketwatch.com

(Jan. 15, 2013) The Washington Post, www.washingtonpost.com

Lichtblau, E. (June 20, 2009) The New York Times, www.nytimes.com

Nelson, L. (April 25, 2017) Politico, www.politico.com

Psaki, J. (Feb. 24, 2018) CNN. www.cnn.com

Reedy, J. (Feb. 20, 2018) The Associated Press, www.ap.org

Sanchez, R.C. Boyette, and E. McLaughlin (Feb. 21, 2018) CNN, www.cnn.com

Spicuzza, M. (Feb. 18, 2018) Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Stracqualursi, V. (Feb. 22, 2018) CNN, www.cnn.com

Swanson, J., McGinty, E., Fazel, S., and V. Mays (May 25, 2015) National Center for Biotechnology Information, www.ncbi.nih.gov

Vales, L (Feb. 22, 2018) CNN, www.cnn.com

(Feb. 20, 2018) Quinnipiac University, www.poll.edu.qu

(Sept. 13, 2004) Violence Policy Center, www.vpc.org

Weingarten, D. (July 1, 2015) The Truth About Guns, www.thetruthaboutguns.org

Wing, N. and M. Reily (Feb. 14, 2018) The Huffington Post, www.huffingtonpost.com

Winkler, A. (2013) W.W. Norton Publishers: New York

Woodrow, J. and S. Rich (Feb. 15, 2018) The Washington Post, www.washingtonpost.com

Zezina, K. and S. Svrluga (Dec. 10, 2017) The Washington Post, www.washingtonpost.com

(Oct. 9, 2017) The Business Insider, www.businessinsider.com