×

Bound to a broken code: Women in the military

Serving their country in uniform has come at a tremendous cost for an untold number of women.

An analysis of 69 studies concluded that nearly one in four U.S. military women experienced sexual assault (unwanted touching, attempted rape and rape) and more than half were targets of sexual harassment. A Department of Defense (DoD) report states that 8% of females in the military experienced unwanted sexual contact (including rape) in 2021, the highest number since tracking these incidents began in 2004. Research indicates that women between 18 and 24 are particularly vulnerable.

The 2021 report found that of the 6,200 sexual-assault reports made by military personnel in fiscal year 2020, only 50 (0.8%) resulted in offender convictions under the Uniform Code of Military Justice and that the overwhelming majority of women who are sexually assaulted do not report the crime.

One victim of “military sexual trauma” (MST) stated that her abuser “outranked me by several grades and had been in the military for years.” As military personnel cannot simply leave the armed forces and find another job, this abuser was “a constant figure” in her life over the next few years. After informing colleagues about her abuse she was told they knew what was happening as other servicewomen had been assaulted by him. Her colleagues did not want to get involved, stating: “‘Look, everyone knows he does this stuff. Do you want to ruin your career and OUR careers because you have an issue with it?'”

One victim told a 2013 congressional committee (Safety for Survivors Care and Treatment for Military Sexual Trauma) that “When you report a rape, you become public enemy number one. No one will talk to you. And if they do it’s to tell you, you got what you deserved. You are called names, you internalize what happened, and it feels like it’s your fault.” In approximately 25% of the MST cases the individual the victim must report the assault to — in the chain of command — is the abuser.

According to a 2004 Naval Inspector General Report on sexual assault, the likelihood that a perpetrator will be punished is almost nonexistent in small units serving in remote locations. The mantra of these units is “What goes on deployment, stays on deployment.” This report stated: “There appears to be a type of ‘loyalty code system’ operating within commands, whereby it is tacitly understood that members owe their loyalty to the Navy, the command, and to their superiors. ‘Whistle-blowing,’ or reporting unethical and/or criminal acts, effectively labels that person as an outsider. According to this code, it is permissible for males to commit criminal acts against females, as the ‘loyalty code’ will protect them and the command image.”

The Safety for Survivors committee reported that sexually abused veterans can only receive treatment if they accept a psychiatric diagnosis. Victims report that military doctors routinely ask them questions such as “How was your childhood?” and “Do you have hallucinations?” These women are often told they are suffering from personality disorders, or diagnosed with “adjustment disorders” or other psychiatric maladies.

Victims of sexual assault strongly object to this treatment that consists of “nothing but pills and pep talks.” The 2004 Naval Inspector General Report states that being sent to a psychiatrist is a heavy burden to bear in the armed forces. Military women who report sexual assaults face the same “myths” about sexual violence that civilian women do — that they are lying about or grossly exaggerating the alleged attacks.

Human Rights Watch published a study titled “Embattled: Retaliation against Sexual Assault Survivors in the US Military.” The summary paragraph states what MST survivors are likely to experience upon reporting the assault: They will be “Spat on. Deprived of food. Assailed with obscenities and insults–whore, cum dumpster, slut, faggot, wildebeest. Threatened with death by ‘friendly fire’ during deployment. Demeaned. Demoted. Disciplined. Discharged for misconduct.”

Some victims note that after reporting an assault they received an assignment change from high-level tasks such as intelligence work to menial chores, including picking up garbage. Assault victims who request a transfer often experience long delays or are told they are ineligible for reassignment. This often means they will remain in close proximity to their abuser.

It’s hardly surprising that only one in four victims reports a sexual assault to military authorities. Surveys of service members consistently find that fear of retaliation from the perpetrator, the perpetrator’s friends, or concern about their careers, as reasons for not reporting. According to a 2019 DoD report (“Sexual Assault Prevention and Response”), of those victims who stated they experienced retaliation as a result of their abuse report, 66% claimed the retaliation came from the “superior in their chain of command.” A 2014 DoD study concluded that military service members who reported sexual assaults were 12 times more likely to suffer retaliation for doing so than to see their offender (if also a service member) convicted for a sex offense.

An investigation by Human Rights Watch concluded that “Military personnel who report a sexual assault frequently find that their military career is the biggest casualty.” Interviews with 163 veterans ousted from the armed forces after reporting sexual assaults “suggest that all too often superior officers choose to expeditiously discharge sexual-assault victims rather than support their recovery and help them keep their position …”

Is the MST scourge improving or getting worse? An April 2023 article in the Military Times says it all: “Sexual assault in the military keeps rising while prosecutions fall.”

It’s a national disgrace that women who volunteer to serve their country are sexually assaulted, then all too often suffer the indignities of crass treatment by the military — an institution ostensibly committed to duty, honor and integrity.

George J. Bryjak lives in Bloomingdale and is retired after 24 years of teaching sociology at the University of San Diego. He served in Okinawa and Vietnam with the First Marine Air Wing. This is part two of a special two-part series in honor of Women’s History Month.

Sources

Belkin, A. 2012. Bring Me Men: Military Masculinity and the Benign Façade of American Empire, 1898-2001. New York: Oxford University Press.

Blanton, D. (1993) “Women soldiers of the Civil War” Spring, Prologue Magazine, National Archives, www.archives.gov

Bourke, J. (2023) “Military sexual trauma: gender, military cultures and the medicalization of abuse in contemporary America” National Institute of Health, www.ncbi.nim.nih.gov

Bryce, B. (2023) “Sexual assault is a huge threat to women in the U.S. military. We have to do better” April 27, USA Today, www.usatoday.com

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs . 2013. Safety for Survivors Care and Treatment for Military Sexual Trauma. Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Health of the Committee of Veterans’ Affairs. U. S. House of Representatives. One Hundred Thirteen Congress. First Session. Friday, June 19, 2013. Serial No. 113-31. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.

“Embattled: retaliation against assault survivors in the military” (2015) May 18, Human Rights Watch, www.hrw.org

“Defense Department report shows decline in armed forces population, while percentage of military women rises slightly” (2023) Department of Defense, www.defense.gov

DeSimone, D. (2023) “Over 200 years of service: the history of women in the U.S. military” February 22, United Service Organization, www.uso.org

“Distribution of commissioned active duty officers in the United States military, by gender and branch of service” (2024) Statista, www.statista.com

“Facts on United States military sexual violence” (2018) February, Protect Our Defenders, www.protectourdefenders.com

“Female soldiers in the Civil War” (accessed 2024) Battlefield Trust, www.battlefield.org

Healing the Wounds Evaluating Military Sexual Trauma Issues. Joint Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs and the Subcommittee on Veterans’ Affairs. U.S. House of Representatives. One Hundred Eleventh Congress. Second Session. May 20, 2010, Serial No. 111-79. 2010. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Invisible Wounds: Examining the Disability Compensation Benefits Process for Victims of Military Sexual Trauma. Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs. U.S. House of Representatives. One Hundred Twelfth Congress. Second Session. Wednesday, July 18, 2012. 2013. serial no. 112-70. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office

King, K. (2013) “Assault victims struggle to transfer to other posts” May 20, San Antonio Express-News, www.mysanantonio.com

Lopez, C. (2023) “In 75 years since Women’s Armed Services Integration Act, female service members have excelled” June 12, Department of Defense, www.defense.gov

“Military celebrates Women’s History Month, March 10, 2023” (2023) U.S. Department of Defense, www.defense.gov

“Military sexual trauma” (accessed 2024) Women Veterans Health Care, Veterans Administration, www.womenshealth.va.gov

Moyer, M. (2021) “‘A poison in the system’: The epidemic of military sexual assault” October 11, The New York Times, www.nytimes.com

Myers, M. (2022) “The military’s sexual assault problem is only getting worse” September 1, Military Times, www.militarytimes.com

Myers. M. (2023) “Sexual assault in the military keeps rising while prosecutions fall” April 27, Military Times, www.militarytimes.com

Nietzel, M. (2022) “America’s military service academies: an outstanding option for undergraduate education” August 30, Forbes, www.forbes.com

Naval Inspector General Report to VCNO. Sexual Assault Study (2004) Washington: Office of the Naval Inspector General.

Nuwer, R. (2014) “Women fought in the Civil War disguised as men – and so do today’s re-enactors” April 14, Smithsonian Magazine, www.smithsonian.com

Panetta, L. and S. Stoneman (2023) “It’s been 10 years since women were allowed in combat. There’s a lot left to accomplish” January 28, The Hill, www.thehill.com

Righthand, J. (2011) “The women who fought in the Civil War” April 7, Smithsonian Magazine, www.smithsonianmag.com

“Prevalence of sexual assault in the military: risk and protective factors, data sources and data uses” (accessed 2024) Rand Corporation, www.rand.org

Sauer, E, (2022) “A brief history of women in the U.S. military” March 8, University of Missouri, Kansas City, http://info.umkc.edu

Thompson, M. (2016) “Military sexual assault victims discharged after filing complaints” May 18, Time Magazine, www.time.com

Unemua, F. (2021) “Eight women’s names are among the thousands on the Vietnam Memorial Wall. Here’s what you should know about them” 27 May, Time Magazine, www.time.com

Vandiver, J. (2022) “Army approach to assault prevention overlook hazing and male victims” February 28, Stars and Stripes, www.stripes.com

“Vietnam era women veterans” (accessed 2024) VA News, www.news.va.gov

Wilson, L. (2018) “The Prevalence of Military Sexual Trauma: A Meta-Analysis” The National Library of Medicine, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

“Women in the military” (2013) June 18, Norfolk Daily News, www.nofolkdailynews.com

“Women in the U.S. Military” (accessed 2024) Helath.mil, the official website of the Military Health System, www.health.mil

“Women in World War 1” (accessed 2024) National Parks Service, www.nps.gov

“World War 1” (accessed 2024) U.S. Government Archives, www.archives.gov

NEWSLETTER

Today's breaking news and more in your inbox

I'm interested in (please check all that apply)
Are you a paying subscriber to the newspaper? *

Starting at $4.75/week.

Subscribe Today