“I read it on the internet” isn’t necessarily the same as, “I read it on the internet, so it must be true.” The real truth is that it’s becoming increasingly difficult to know what’s true and what’s not.

We’re flooded with information, which makes it difficult to distinguish between what is factual as opposed to an opinion. Too often, a source that appears to be “official” or authoritative emanates from a person or organization that has a political goal or is biased in some way.

We’ve been hearing a lot lately about “fake news,” and most of us have, at one time or another, believed that news was accurate, only to learn later that it was false. Many of us, and especially young people, go to Google when we want information, but how can we be reasonably certain that the information posted online is accurate or, in some cases, either deliberately misleading or an opinion rather than fact?

As citizens and consumers, we have a need for reliable information. Rather than instantly accepting what we read, it is important to consider the source. Does the information come from an industry association or a person or organization that is completely unfamiliar? Or is the source a professional journalist whose job involves providing the public with unbiased objective information?

One of the tools used by journalists is a law that generally requires that government records be made available to the public. There is a federal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) that applies to federal government records, and every state has enacted its own version of an FOI law. In New York, it’s called the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL). Under the federal act and in most states, it doesn’t matter who you are, where you live or even why you want them — anyone can request government records.

Most FOI laws are based on a presumption that government records are available. Unless the government can justifiably rely on an exception to rights of access appearing in the law, records must be disclosed. Usually the exceptions relate to the possibility that disclosure would result in some sort of harm. For example, typical is an exception intended to protect personal privacy. If I request your Social Security number from a government agency, the agency has to deny access. That item can be used as a connection to a variety of other information about all of us that’s nobody’s business. If the police are investigating a crime, and disclosure would interfere with the investigation, the government can deny access.

But when we’re trying to learn the truth, the government is required to disclose statistics and facts. If politician tells us that the water we drink is safe and you want to know if that’s true, you can obtain the latest tests from a local health department or water authority to find out what’s in the water. It’s also important to know whether the politician is trustworthy and deserves your support. If you’re having trouble with math and want to find out whether your teacher is certified to teach that subject, FOIL gives you the right to request and obtain the record indicating that the teacher is qualified (or not). You can and need to be informed in order to make your own judgment.

Government records, more often than not, are based on the facts and are accurate. When you use FOIL to obtain records from a government agency, whether it’s your county, city, town or school district, you know the source and can feel with certainty that their content is real — not fake.

Robert J. Freeman is executive director of the New York State Committee on Open Government, part of the Department of State.