Most letters to DEC in favor of fire towers
By MIKE LYNCH, Enterprise Outdoors WriterArticle Photos
Most writers who submitted letters to the state Department of Environmental Conservation regarding the St. Regis and Hurricane mountain fire towers were in favor of the keeping the structures.
The letters were submitted during the recent public comment periods for both an amendment to the St. Regis Canoe Area unit management plan and the adoption of the Hurricane Mountain Primitive Area UMP. The Enterprise obtained the letters through a Freedom of Information Law request.
Of the roughly 100 letters submitted on both towers and reviewed by the Enterprise, about 85 were in favor of the fire towers.
The strong support follows a trend at the public meetings and in a Web poll conducted by the Enterprise.
During the two public hearings in March, 31 of 37 speakers at the hearings - 84 percent - called for the fire towers to remain. In an unscientific, week-long poll on the Adirondack Daily Enterprise website in mid-February, 606, or 92 percent, of the 661 votes cast were in favor of the fire towers.
The issue will be before the state Adirondack Park Agency on Thursday, when the board is scheduled to continue discussing options to potentially save the towers, a topic initiated at last month's meeting. Among the options it is considering is to designate land under the tower as historic.
The APA board will also be considering a first reading for the Hurricane Mountain UMP, which includes the DEC's proposal to remove the fire tower. But APA spokesman Keith McKeever said the fire tower proposal will be pulled from the UMP for now.
Neither fire tower is being used by the public, and both would require maintenance to reopen. Supporters of the fire towers have included a wide array of people: boy scouts, hikers, historians and former and current DEC employees.
"I do not believe this tower takes away from the 'essence of wilderness' and actually helps more people become aware of the 'wonder of wilderness," wrote renowned nature photographer Carl Heilman II in a letter to the DEC about the St. Regis tower. "I expect rehabilitating the tower would be less expensive than its removal, and would best serve future generations. It sure provides some great photo opps and makes a great destination for both children and adults."
The controversy inspired Boy Scout Troop 107 from Perryville to write letters in favor of the towers.
"It is a place of history," wrote Boy Scout Brad Lucas about the Hurricane fire tower. "It should be there for future generations to see. These fire towers are symbols of the Adirondack Park and they are slowly disappearing. I hope you take my request and the other requests from my scout troop into consideration."
The fire towers' historical value is the most commonly used reason by letter writers for keeping them. Both are listed on the National Register of Historic Places.
Other organizations or individuals who either submitted letters or resolutions in favor of the towers included the town of Brighton, Essex County Board of Supervisors, Local Government Review Board and Assemblywoman Teresa Sayward, R-Willsboro.
"The presence of the (St. Regis) fire tower as a hiking destination brings tourists to our town and thus has an economic value to a community which has recently suffered the closer of one state facility and is facing yet another at year's end," stated a resolution from the town of Brighton. "We feel the fire tower should be restored to its original state for the future benefit of local citizens and tourists and the economic well-being of our community."
Among the handful of people or organizations calling for the towers to be removed are the three major Adirondack environmental organizations: Protect the Adirondacks!, the Adirondack Mountain Club and the Adirondack Council. The organizations have said the towers should be removed in order to comply with the Adirondack Park State Land Master Plan.
---
Contact Mike Lynch at 891-2600 ext. 28 or mlynch@adirondackdailyenterprise.com.
|
Edward678
|
|
|---|---|
|
05-13-10 5:16 PM
|
Put cell phone antennas on them that way they can serve the public saftey.
|
|
f111crew
|
|
|
05-13-10 8:05 AM
|
Scrap metal.
|
|
Walker
|
|
|
05-13-10 7:36 AM
|
Bill, as one who is both an environmentalist AND a lover of history let me say that I wish your belief in the power of federal and state historic preservation laws was justified. In fact, the towers are listed on the National Register of Historic Places, as status that confers essentially NO protection. Paul Smiths College recently tore down an historic cottage on its campus that was listed on the NHRP. As Wikipedia says "While National Register listings are mostly symbolic, they do provide some financial incentive to owners of listed properties. No protection of the property is guaranteed." What we need is to add REAL historic preservation protection to NY state law.
|
|
upstate
|
|
|
05-12-10 4:52 PM
|
it would be a shame to see the towers go they draw people in just to see or get a chance to climb and look out the windows at the view !!
|
|
billstarr
|
|
|
05-12-10 1:25 PM
|
Two issues concerning these fire towers are; 1) The SLMP. The environmental groups and some APA staffers falsely believe that the SLMP supersedes both federal and state historic preservation laws that protect these two fire towers. It does not. 2) Fire towers are loved by the public statewide, not just in the Adirondacks. Grandparents and parents wish to share their childhood memories of fire towers with their children today. These fire towers are also landmarks which dovetail into local history for communities and families. The fire towers were established to serve a single purpose, but they soon evolved into facilities that served, and continue to serve, the people of New York in many ways. Contrary to what avid supporters of the environmental movement think their ideology is not overwhelming accepted by the public as they believe it is. Bill Starr, state director of the Forest Fire Lookout Assoc. and former fire tower observer.
|




