Council may sue village over salt
By NATHAN BROWN, Enterprise Staff WriterArticle Photos
SARANAC LAKE - An environmental group has filed papers stating it will sue Saranac Lake in 60 days if the village doesn't move or cover its sand pile, which contains salt and is situated near a brook that feeds into Lake Colby.
The Adirondack Council's suit, which would be in U.S. District Court in Albany, would allege two violations of the federal Clean Water Act, said Council spokesman John Sheehan: discharging waste into the stream without a permit and violation of the turbidity and suspended solids standard. The Council believes the sand pile is largely responsible for the lake's high salt levels due to runoff that enters the brook and then the lake, via a marsh.
If nothing changes in 60 days and the lawsuit is filed, the possible federal fine if the lawsuit is successful is up to $37,500 a day for every day the violation can be proved. Sheehan said this would be about $162.4 million, going back six years - about 19 times the village's 2009-10 budget. Although testing has been going on for longer, 2003 is when the Adirondack Lake Assessment Program began testing under the auspices of Paul Smith's College.
"A normal lake in the Adirondacks has less than one part per million of chloride," said Lee Keet, a member of the Lake Colby Association, which represents a number of nearby property owners. "Last year, Colby had 39 parts per million."
Sustained levels of 10 parts per million or higher can affect the plants and animals in the lake, Sheehan said.
Sheehan said the brook's reading was 480 parts per million this year, although it has been higher; it was 719 parts per million in 2003, he said. Levels higher than 250 parts per million are illegally high under state and federal law, Keet said.
"This is a federal law being broken, and the (state Department of Environmental Conservation), which is supposed to be enforcing it here, has not done its job," Sheehan said.
The pile is located on the village highway garage property on Van Buren Street; the brook runs on that property.
"I think it's really baseless, because we have been working on this," said village Trustee Jeff Branch. "This is just bullying tactics."
The small pure salt pile is already covered and always has been, said village Manager Marty Murphy; the much larger sand pile, which contains about 5 percent salt, is uncovered.
"At present time, the village is not under any order or mandate from the Department of Environmental Conservation or the Department of Health to cover (its) pile," Murphy said. "We've heard there's elevated levels of chloride in Lake Colby, but we haven't seen the data."
Keet said association members noticed the "lake was getting cloudier and saltier" about eight years ago, and tracked it back to the pile. He said the association has worked well with the village over the years, and helped obtain a $175,000 grant to build a sand and salt shed.
"We're not a party to the suit, but we've been trying to get something done about the levels of pollution," Keet said.
Keet said the water in Lake Colby was clear enough to drink 10 years ago, and some residents still drink it, but "I wouldn't drink it today, and I'm not sure if I would let my kids swim in it," Keet said. "While we regret the fact that someone had to file a suit over this, I guess after eight years it's about time."
Murphy said he has never had any contact with the Adirondack Council during his year-and-a-half as village manager and did not receive notice of the Council's intent until later Wednesday, after he had already been contacted by local media.
Branch said the village took its own water samples last year.
"I had discussions with the DEC," Branch said. "It's inconclusive whether we're the cause of any sort of chloride contamination to the lake. However, I don't think that negates our responsibility to do the salt and sand shed, but we have to do it properly, and we have to take care of the taxpayers when we do it. And that's what we're doing."
One possibility various village trustees have suggested is that much of the lake salt is leeching from nearby roadways, such as state Route 86, which runs along the lakeshore.
The town of Harrietstown and village of Saranac Lake have been discussing building a joint sand-salt shed for some time. The village has a $175,000 grant for it, and the town is currently writing another grant proposal to help fund its construction at its highway garage on John Munn Road. Branch said the village is waiting for more input from the town at this time.
The project was put out to bid last year, but both the village and the town rejected the bids that came in as too high. Some trustees, including Branch, favored putting the shed on the village garage property, while the other trustees and town officials favored the town property. The location was hotly debated at several meetings in 2008.
The village has made no decisions on how to respond to the potential lawsuit, but one possibility, said village Trustee Susan Waters, might be for the village to stop mixing the sand with the salt until the sand is ready to be used.
"I'm all for whatever gets us to the end solution," Waters said. "We need to make sure Lake Colby is safe."
Sheehan and Keet said the high salt levels are having a number of effects on the plants and animals in the lake. For example, the increasing cloudiness of the lake blocks sunlight for plants, Sheehan said. It can also kill off the plankton that small crustaceans eat, Sheehan said, which in turn affects the fish that eat them. It could also affect animals by removing their shelter as plants die.
Keet said there have been fewer weeds over the past 10 years.
"Most of the weeds that are gone promote phosphorus and healthy fish," Keet said. "The ones that don't seem terribly affected are invasives like Eurasian milfoil."
Lake Colby is spring-fed; aside from what runs in through the brook, the only other source of input is rainwater. Keet said he estimates the lake would take between three and five years to purge itself of the salt.
Lake Colby's shoreline is about 17,000 feet, of which 1,500 feet are privately owned and the rest are owned by the village, town or state. Lake Colby Beach, the main beach for Saranac Lake residents, is on the lake, and many people use the lake for fishing, swimming and boating.
---
Contact Nathan Brown at 891-2600 ext. 26 or nbrown@adirondackdailyenterprise.com.
|
contrary1
|
|
|---|---|
|
06-15-09 9:42 AM
|
If more money was spent building salt and sand sheds, and less spent on studying, this issue could have been dealt with at the same time other communities built their sheds. If the trustees weren't such slackers, the Adirondack Council wouldn't be attacking. They won't mention the state's liberal use of roadsalt, any more than they fought the installation of a 300ft. radio tower on Teboville Mountain near Duane. If it promotes the tourism or second home industry, it's full steam ahead and to heck with the law. If it doesn't, there is no legal semantic too small to argue. Did they complain about the National Grids new power lines to LP, even though it requires a Constitutional amendment that hasn't happened? I'm surprised nobody has sued THEM yet. Build the shed and be done with it. A lot of other other communities already have.
|
|
vendor
|
|
|
06-12-09 6:09 PM
|
I have to ask. Who is Mr. Keat's charitable to the Adirondack Council? That the way the council works donate to them and the either fight for you. Or against your development if you don't send cash.
|
|
ADKDUDE
|
|
|
06-12-09 2:50 PM
|
And, for what it's worth....I agree with IMatter2's statement. At least Mr. Keat uses his money(he is very quietly charitable)and his actions for the benefit of all his neighbors.
|
|
ADKDUDE
|
|
|
06-12-09 2:19 PM
|
Also baffeling, is how Jackkk seems to be keen on insisting that everything is politically driven....Couldn't it be that some are interested in doing whatever they can to make sure that our environment is kept in tact for future generations? Perhaps stepping away from the computer keyboard and heading outside to help would be more productive. Just my opinion.
|
|
twinrivers
|
|
|
06-12-09 10:54 AM
|
The issue of Lake Colby is indeed part of a much larger issue. Contaminated wells from highway salt,etc. Its baffling that some people view efforts to provide clean water as an affront. ??
|
|
jackkk
|
|
|
06-12-09 9:43 AM
|
This is just the first of many issues you are going to see trickle down from the extremist liberal left. What is occurring is called a soft tyranny. Keep voting Democratic people. You aint seen nothing yet.
|
|
northcountrynell
|
|
|
06-12-09 9:41 AM
|
When life gives you lemons......I say stock the lake with Blue Fin tuna, Albacore,Red Snapper. Why go to Belize when you can go to Lake Colby. Gotta raise the 10hp motor limit for the tiny Sportfish boats though. Really....as others stated. With all the salt poured onto the roadways and running into....lets say the WB Ausable river....this argument seems tiny. Why not address the entire scope of the problem.
|
|
TourPro
|
|
|
06-12-09 6:56 AM
|
This whole thing is pretty bizarre. Seems like there should be more to this story. Intent to Sue as an opening message is pretty lame. And I also agree that it is simply ridiculous to ignore the Park-wide application of road-salt as the chief contributor. I'm sure the roads leading to The Council's office and Parking lot are being "left in their natural state". Or maybe they don't actually drive vehicles into The Park? Anyway, it does also seems strange that salt would be left open to precipitation. Isn't that stuff kind of expensive?
|
|
TEastman
|
|
|
06-11-09 9:29 PM
|
Trustee Branch's stewardship of the taxpayers' money regarding correcting this matter will seem pretty shoddy if the Village is found in violation of the CWA and federal penalties $$$ are imposed. Delay in addressing water quality issues is something that the Village's legal advisors should not have permitted on their watch.
|
|
IMatter2
|
|
|
06-11-09 9:07 PM
|
The Lake Colby Association strikes again. I think they should just banish the village and town boards and let Mr. Keet and his neighbors run the whole darn place.
|
|
vendor
|
|
|
06-11-09 8:54 PM
|
adker, I think we a agree for the most part. Less salt is the solution. The hypocrisy of these groups to sue the village. When the state has just as much responsibility if not more over a far wider area. The Lake Colby association using the Council to do their dirty work smells also.
|
|
adkerforever
|
|
|
06-11-09 8:19 PM
|
Vendor: Villager is right on. What's the difference if the salt is coming down the stream from the sand pile or off the road from the DOT or town plow trucks...it makes no difference to the lake. Its all bad! Sure it helps make the road safer to drive-on, but so would slowing down. If most of Canada and the Rocky Mountain states can get by without vast quantities of road salt, so can we.
|
|
concerned
|
|
|
06-11-09 8:18 PM
|
P.S. most of us have noticed the cool skillfully built leanto's on the bloomingdale rd accross from mckiilips old dairy.they are built there and sold and reassembled on the buyers property...i look each time i pass as it's always so interesting.........sad note some tree huggers objected and the owner of the project had to lay off the guys doing the work and it will probably take him all summer to get ppermits...congratulations huggers are you going to send money to help these men and their families?
|
|
concerned
|
|
|
06-11-09 8:09 PM
|
that's typical of treehugger outfits..pick on the village during a financial crisis.....why don't you folks get together and take up a collection and donate a shed to the village.........obviosly you have money to give to candidates come election time........why not complain about the state salting the roads near water like the cascade lakes where 100% of the salt runs into the water, oh i forgot, bullies don't like to pick on people bigger than them. the state has attornies that might just clean your clock
|
|
vendor
|
|
|
06-11-09 5:44 PM
|
Blaming the village for salt contamination when NYSDOT pours 200 tons per hour on our highways, is hypocritical. As far as the sample taken from the creek by people who had the agenda to prove contamination, it seems suspect. But the real question is why do we need to use salt in such huge quantities. Maybe the DEC should be concerned with that. Instead of their carbon foot print.
|
|
Villager
|
|
|
06-11-09 4:37 PM
|
Let's face it, the REAL issue is that is shouldn't take 10 years to build a salt shed!! No wonder more complex issues aren't resolved quickly. Stop arguing whether the Village or Town should pay more, build the gosh darn salt shed now!
|
|
deedeejr
|
|
|
06-11-09 4:18 PM
|
Doesn't Trustee Fontanas husband work for DEC. Also vendor you are right on. The Adirondack Councils own website indicates there mission statement of supporting vibrant Adirondack Communities. What a great sign of support. Must be somebody did not renew there dues.
|
|
twinrivers
|
|
|
06-11-09 4:10 PM
|
The village has a responsibility, as does DEC, to protect water quality for us, the local people. The salt has been going on for years. If it had been fixed, there would be no need for a lawsuit.
|
|
vendor
|
|
|
06-11-09 3:35 PM
|
There's your common ground alliance Brian Houseal, and the Council sticking it to the local people.
|
|
woohoo
|
|
|
06-11-09 12:39 PM
|
you HAVE to be kidding!!!
|




