Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Customer Service | Tearsheets | Media Kit | Home RSS
 
 
 

Best to vote no to casino proposal

October 10, 2013

Sadly, the decision about voting yes or no to whether New York should allow more casinos requires the voter to weigh more than just the pros and cons of the question itself: e.g....

« Back to Article

 
 
sort: oldest | newest

Comments

(8)

bjccd5

Oct-16-13 9:03 PM

Vote YES!!!! Revenue is of the utmost importance for NYS tax payers. This tax culture that we have is dependent upon ideals like this. No criticism allowed from any group that has a potential hypocrisy!!!

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

AdkBuddy

Oct-16-13 10:36 AM

Of course, if passed will any of it come our way? That's another story.

1 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

AdkBuddy

Oct-16-13 10:36 AM

Yes gambling can be a problem. Maybe some revenues could be directed to problem gambling services (if not already) but gamblers are going to gamble. We might as well get a cut of it.

1 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Lifeisgood

Oct-13-13 10:00 PM

New Yorkers across the state "enjoy" the worst tax climate in the entire country. It's time to pull the stops on protecting people from themselves. If people want to gamble they will find a way. The lottery, pull tabs, OTB, the race track, bingo, an illegal bookie or a Friday night card game in someone's basement.....Why all the worry about casinos? Makes no sense.

3 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

bjccd5

Oct-11-13 8:42 PM

Absolutely lousy argument ADE!!! Loaded language? Large campaign contributions from a special interest? Have you been under a rock??? then claiming their propaganda is a rosy promise??? Job growth, school aid increases and lower property taxes are a REALITY if passed. I am not vested either way as to how I may vote, but your argument has no merit, to me anyway. Sounds like a personal issue to me. You want "rosy promises"? Look into what the railroad promised years ago, there's something to legitimately raise concern over.

2 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

LozerBoozer

Oct-11-13 11:57 AM

I would vote not simply because we already have enough casinos. How many more do we need?? Surely dont want or need any more!!

1 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

OmarLittle

Oct-10-13 9:16 PM

Because the current system where only the state and the Indians get to run gambling makes sense?

Some people like to gamble at casinos. They're going to do it. Not saying a casino is right for every community, but if people want one they should have the option, rather than the state saying it's not allowed.

Sure, gambling interests make big political contributions. So do unions, businesses, and anyone else with an agenda and two nickels to rub together. That doesn't seem like much of an argument against their cause to me. You could use that argument against pretty much any law that has ever been voted on.

2 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

wondering

Oct-10-13 12:36 PM

Bravo, great editorial.

2 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 8 of 8 comments
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or
 
 

 

I am looking for:
in:
News, Blogs & Events Web