Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Customer Service | Tearsheets | Media Kit | Home RSS
 
 
 

Mixed view of Cuomo’s agenda

January 12, 2013

Gov. Andrew Cuomo has accomplished much and enjoyed amazing popularity since his easy election in 201....

« Back to Article

 
 
sort: oldest | newest

Comments

(36)

OsamaBinHidin

Jan-12-13 6:53 AM

there@ThefacebookWall................

goo.gl/ccGYB

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

AdkBuddy

Jan-14-13 11:08 AM

In spite of LTC regurgitating the same old right wing propoganda, New York is always going to have liberal governors. As such we can only hope every now and then we get a good one, and Cuomo may be the best we have had in years. No Pataki was no good. Cuomo faces a $60 billion debt, and has to deal with Sheldon Silver and his corrupt cronies from NY City. His efforts to promote upstate New York are good, but when it comes to the Adks specifically he will need to take on the radical environmentalists or bail out on us. I wish him well.

5 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

ITprober

Jan-14-13 12:07 PM

You are kidding right? 69,000 MORE acres bought on the backs of New York workers. Liberal agenda, ready to get the State Police to come and get registered gun owners' weapons, and to start having them register to buy ammunition. But then again you lefties will love anything having to do with denigration of conservatives or anything conservative. that includes Christianity, (not muslims or course), and will rubber stamp anyone that runs under the democratic ticket, be they socialist or otherwise. Oh hey BTW, did you read that PRAVDA has declared this country to be Socialist now? Welcome Comrades to your USSA. If you libs don't see it, you are blind and stupid.

4 Agrees | 9 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

ITprober

Jan-14-13 12:08 PM

It is all about power over the people. (Serfs)

4 Agrees | 8 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

ITprober

Jan-14-13 12:10 PM

OH yes I forgot, most of you people love being under control of the state.

3 Agrees | 9 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

ITprober

Jan-14-13 12:12 PM

Is that not right? Especially the newspapers(sic) (using that term loosely) in the ADK compound, are lapdogs for ecologists, gun control advocates and pot smokers.

2 Agrees | 9 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

ITprober

Jan-14-13 12:14 PM

that is because you all have been raised in the ADK Compound Way. Never have any of you had the chance to live in a "free-er" state? I bet not.

3 Agrees | 9 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

ITprober

Jan-14-13 12:14 PM

You all don't know any better. Serfdom.

3 Agrees | 9 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

ITprober

Jan-14-13 12:16 PM

BTW, when will ScaryNack Lake open its first pot store? I bet the town will empty out and have lines around Lake "Flour",, HAHAHA

0 Agrees | 7 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

ITprober

Jan-14-13 12:17 PM

You will sell out on Granola then!

2 Agrees | 7 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

ITprober

Jan-15-13 12:48 PM

Prince Andrew is getting his way. without public input once again. Backdoor politics by the demoncrats. And I bet most of you granola eaters support this tyranny.

2 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

ITprober

Jan-16-13 7:56 AM

Now here is a question for all of you: How is this seven round law going to be enforced when many people (men and women) own magazines with a larger capacity than seven rounds? You tell me. What about carbines that have ten rounds? What about lever action rifles that have a capacity of 8 rounds? i.e. Marlins and Winchesters. When do the Troopers start coming to your door? Not one of you have an answer.

1 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

wondering

Jan-16-13 10:12 AM

IT, you rail at pot smokers but judging from your behavior you seem to have a stimulant addiction. You seem to be sinking ever deeper into a fantasy world.

4 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

designer5

Jan-16-13 10:33 AM

Duprey says that this law also forbids inheritance of lawful weapons to qualified family members. Not only are they trying to eliminate rights guaranteed under the second amendment, this is a clear violation of American's fifth amendment rights,"nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law".

2 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

ITprober

Jan-16-13 12:19 PM

Like I said, there are no answers from the skittles crowd, and include yourself in that clique wondering. I bet your utopia would be full of unicorns and rainbows.

1 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

GUFFSHENE

Jan-16-13 12:20 PM

liberals are getting what they want, they are just too steeped in their own narcissism that they don`t realize that liberals will be the first to be singled out in a Govt controlled by a would be dictator. Ancient Rome all over again.

2 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

wondering

Jan-16-13 1:17 PM

No IT, I don't eat skittles, too dangerous, it got Trayvon Martin murdered in FLA.

3 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

wondering

Jan-16-13 1:18 PM

Guff, You're probably right, any would-be dictator would focus on the ones capable of critical thought.

3 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

ITprober

Jan-16-13 3:46 PM

Oh you mean the thug that the homeowner George Zimmerman was protecting his property and neighborhood against? The thug got what he deserved.

2 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

wondering

Jan-16-13 5:29 PM

Only a coward of the worst sort sees an unarmed man walking away as a threat. Cowards are the last people we want walking around armed. If Zimmerman had been unarmed no confrontation would have occurred and neither man would have been harmed.

4 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

wondering

Jan-17-13 8:05 AM

II, What's "homeowner" Zimmerman have to do with anything? He wasn't in his home, his yard or even in front of his home. Are you implying that homeowners have rights that renters or homeless people don't have?

3 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

ITprober

Jan-17-13 12:20 PM

Yes. Homeowners should and do have more rights and things to protect.

1 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

wondering

Jan-17-13 12:33 PM

Yes but as I said he wasn't protecting his home or even his "things". Any extra "rights" a homeowner has beyond those of a non-homeowner end at their property line. Martin was in public space with every bit as much right to be there as Zimmerman. As I said, take the gun out of that situation and no one would have been hurt.

4 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

wondering

Jan-17-13 5:26 PM

Yah the jury can decide Zimmerman's fate but Martin's already been decided by a guy with more firepower than brains.

3 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

GUFFSHENE

Jan-18-13 11:33 AM

Today`s Guest Commentary is a good piece, sorta puts Mr Bryjak in his place. Good stuff and well written.

1 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 25 of 36 comments Show More Comments
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or
 
 

 

I am looking for:
in:
News, Blogs & Events Web